Beliefs correspondences and equilibria in ambiguous games
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Beliefs Correspondences and Equilibria in Ambiguous Games1
The Nash equilibrium concept combines two fundamental ideas. First, rational players choose the most preferred strategy given their beliefs about what other players will do. Second, it imposes the consistency condition that all players’ beliefs are correct. This consistency condition has often been considered too strong and different solution concepts have been introduced in the literature in o...
متن کاملVariational preferences and equilibria in games under ambiguous belief correspondences
In previous papers we studied a game model in which players' uncertainty is expressed entirely in the space of probabilities (lotteries) over consequences, it depends on the entire strategy profile chosen by the agents and it is described by the so called ambiguous beliefs correspondences. In this paper, we extend the previous results by embodying variational preferences in the model. We give a...
متن کاملA limit theorem for equilibria under ambiguous belief correspondences
Previous literature shows that, in many different models, limits of equilibria of perturbed games are equilibria of the unperturbed game when the sequence of perturbed games converges to the unperturbed one in an appropriate sense. The question whether such limit property extends to the equilibrium notions in ambiguous games is not yet clear as it seems; in fact, previous literature shows that ...
متن کاملSecurity Games with Ambiguous Beliefs of Agents
Currently the Dempster-Shafer based algorithm and Uniform Random Probability based algorithm are the preferred method of resolving security games, in which defenders are able to identify attackers and only strategy remained ambiguous. However this model is inefficient in situations where resources are limited and both the identity of the attackers and their strategies are ambiguous. The intent ...
متن کاملAmbiguous act equilibria
A novel approach for the study of games with strategic uncertainty is proposed. Games are defined such that players’ strategy spaces do nor only contain pure and mixed strategies but also contain “ambiguous act strategies”, in the sense that players can base their choices on subjective randomization devices. The notions of “independent strategies” as well as “common priors” are relaxed in such ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: International Journal of Intelligent Systems
سال: 2011
ISSN: 0884-8173
DOI: 10.1002/int.21515